Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

From: "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug
Date: 2006-02-12 17:34:26
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0602122030260.15708-100000@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> > The problem with that is in fact in pl_exec.c in function
> > compatible_tupdesc(), which do not check for the deleted attributes.
>
> Is that really the only problem?

I cannot be completely sure in that, but at least the submitted patch
eliminate the problem with the SQL code from my previous email.

Regards,
Sergey

*****************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-02-12 18:33:30 Re: User Defined Types in Java
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-12 17:28:43 Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-12 19:13:51 ALTER CONSTRAINT RENAME patch reverted
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-12 17:28:43 Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug