Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger

From: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Denis Lussier <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger
Date: 2005-06-28 13:19:12
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0506281502220.9650-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> What do you think you need for enhanced protocol ?
>

What I need? Some like synchronous elog(NOTICE,''), which can return some
user's interaction, if it's possible. I didn't find how I do it with
current set of messages. But my knowleadges of protocol are minimal.

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2005-06-28 13:40:42 Re: Occupied port warning
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-06-28 13:14:29 Re: Occupied port warning