| From: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |
| Date: | 2005-06-22 02:59:05 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0506220458480.8113-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
this patch is last
Pavel
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I sended version with only LEAST and GREATEST
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00185.php
> >
> > this patch contains diff files for NEXT_DAY and LAST_DAY function too,
> > which I think are generally usefull.
> >
> > There is duplicity with CASE.
> >
>
> Would you resend a patch with just LEAST/GREATEST. The version in the
> patches queue is from June 7, but the patch you reference above is from
> June 8 and I want to make sure we have your latest work, or are both
> patches OK for LEAST/GREATEST.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-22 03:11:38 | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-06-22 02:56:18 | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |