| From: | alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DBD::PgSPI 0.02 |
| Date: | 2004-12-06 19:55:10 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0412061453080.10941-100000@bawx.pilosoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I disagree. The crucial difference is that DBD::Pg is a client side
> library and plperl is not.
>
> I would like all perl programmers to be able to use the same (or
> similar) idioms on both the client side and the server side. (Just as
> one can use JDBC idioms in PL/Java, iirc). So I want a DBI handle to be
> available in core plperl if possible.
Just like perl programmers need to download DBD::Pg to deal with Pg on
client side, I don't see what's so wrong with them having to download
DBD::PgSPI to deal with it on server side.
Besides the fact is that they have to download DBI to get *anywhere* in
the first place ;0
-alex
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-12-06 19:56:19 | Re: DBD::PgSPI 0.02 |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-12-06 19:53:13 | Re: SSL confirmation - (could not accept SSL connection: |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-12-06 19:56:19 | Re: DBD::PgSPI 0.02 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-12-06 19:52:37 | Re: [Testperf-general] Re: 8.0beta5 results w/ dbt2 |