Re: Two questions from the boss (SQL:2003 && scalability)

From: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: John Wells <jbwellsiv(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two questions from the boss (SQL:2003 && scalability)
Date: 2004-10-21 21:23:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0410211421090.3308-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 21 Oct 2004, Robert Treat wrote:

> slony to set up load balancing depending on your needs... though I
> should say that PostgreSQL has tremendous ability to scale up even
> without getting into all the buzzword friendly schemes.

You should strive to pool your connections, though. Of course, that's just
common sense, but for postgres it might also make a big difference,
depending on your usage.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2004-10-21 21:55:12 Slony-I 1.0.4 Released
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-10-21 20:56:36 Re: Two questions from the boss (SQL:2003 && scalability)