| From: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans |
| Date: | 2004-08-25 18:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0408252035130.9559-100000@zigo.dhs.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 25 Aug 2004, Greg Stark wrote:
> It's only allowed when the transaction is in READ UNCOMMITTED isolation level.
> Something Postgres doesn't currently support. In fact I'm not aware of any SQL
> database that supports it, though I'm sure there's one somewhere.
Looks like mysql also supports it:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/InnoDB_transaction_isolation.html
Together with the other replies we now have a whole bunch of databases
that implements it.
--
/Dennis Björklund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-25 18:43:43 | pgsql-server: Revise ResourceOwner code to avoid accumulating |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-08-25 14:18:52 | Re: pgsql-server: Add ALTER INDEX, particularly for |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-25 20:08:21 | Re: Typo in a comment in initdb.c |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-25 18:33:15 | Re: vm/swap used until exhausted |