From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | 7.5 or 8.0? (Was: Re: Update on PITR ) |
Date: | 2004-03-31 19:22:17 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0403312220310.6396-100000@emo.org.tr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing changes has
> > fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more important task of
> > PITR.) Do we have a planned freeze month yet?
>
> There's not really a plan at the moment, but I had June in the back of
> my head as a good time; it looks to me like the Windows port will be
> stable enough for beta in another month or two, and it'd be good if
> PITR were ready to go by then.
BTW... PITR, Windows port, possibly Tablespaces and more... Does the
core team intend to use 8.0 instead of 7.5?
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org devrim(dot)gunduz(at)linux(dot)org(dot)tr
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAaxprtl86P3SPfQ4RAqDKAKDmLHQS3KJDlNdhKkIJEzCCjzKk0gCeLQiX
zOpH7jHB9qpJeLvXnm2/+n8=
=DCvJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-31 19:31:06 | Re: 7.5 or 8.0? (Was: Re: Update on PITR ) |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-31 19:09:05 | Re: Best open source db poll currently |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-31 19:31:06 | Re: 7.5 or 8.0? (Was: Re: Update on PITR ) |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-03-31 18:42:53 | Re: Update on PITR |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-31 19:31:06 | Re: 7.5 or 8.0? (Was: Re: Update on PITR ) |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-03-31 18:42:53 | Re: Update on PITR |