| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Preventing duplicate vacuums? |
| Date: | 2004-02-07 05:43:25 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0402062142430.12927-100000@hosting.commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> What about a situation where someone would have lazy vacuums cron'd and
> it takes longer to complete the vacuum than the interval between
> vacuums. You could wind up with an ever increasing queue of vacuums.
>
> Erroring out with a "vacuum already in progress" might be useful.
I have seen this many times with customers as their traffic on the
database grows. A simple check would be of great, great use.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
--
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-07 06:39:13 | Re: bug in substring??? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-02-07 05:07:12 | Re: Preventing duplicate vacuums? |