| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC |
| Date: | 2003-11-30 13:55:34 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311301452060.11144-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark writes:
> My understanding was that at least on some platforms once you need -fPIC for
> some libraries you need to make sure they were all compiled with it. That
> means it's a pain if any libraries are provided compiled with -fpic because
> whenever find one that reaches that threshold they all have to be recompiled.
Considering that mostly everyone else uses -fPIC across the board (because
it is libtool's behavior and also the policy of several distributions),
either no one has used PostgreSQL on those platforms or there is no
problem.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-30 15:49:29 | Re: Patch queue |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-11-30 12:57:44 | Re: Materialized views proposal |