Re: ALTER SEQUENCE enchancement

From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER SEQUENCE enchancement
Date: 2003-11-24 06:11:59
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311240708590.29118-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Is there demand for this syntax:
>
> ALTER SEQUENCE ON table(col) CYCLE 100;
>
> It would allow us to become sequence-name independent...

The above is an operation that would not help me a lot, but a way of
performing currval() without knowing the sequence name would be good.

--
/Dennis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-24 06:20:41 Re: ALTER SEQUENCE enchancement
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-24 06:07:23 ALTER SEQUENCE enchancement