Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 09:15:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311181012360.3317-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dann Corbit writes:

> > > Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
> >
> > No, it does not.
>
> Really?
>
> What's this then?
> http://www.cygwin.com/licensing.html

The Cygwin license, the GPL, specifically says:

Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not
covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of
running the Program is not restricted, ...

So "commercial use" is clearly allowed.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 09:22:33 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-11-18 08:22:45 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?