| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Date: | 2003-11-17 23:50:25 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171550090.6852-100000@hosting.commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
> least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
Yes but these are people running Unix/Linux/BSD not Windows ;)
> have to come up with better reasons. Also note that most major number
> changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
> the project has moved to a new phase. I don't see any such move
> happening.
>
>
--
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-18 00:37:20 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-17 23:46:56 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-17 23:53:50 | Re: Background writer process |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-17 23:46:56 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |