Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-24 15:07:21
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310241701370.17076-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> If they _must_ be done the way you suggest, why have we been able to
> generate reliable release notes all these years?

With all respect for your work and your enthusiasm for this approach, but
personally, I have absolutely no confidence that the release notes are
complete, accurate, or reliable. That is my deeply founded motivation for
trying to institute changes. But I might be wrong and my fears might have
no merit.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-24 15:23:56 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-24 14:10:33 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-24 15:23:56 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Adam Witney 2003-10-24 14:19:36 Re: shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4