Re: postgres --help-config

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres --help-config
Date: 2003-10-14 21:46:28
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310142344230.22628-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Let me be clear on this --- your tools is not part of the PostgreSQL
> community. We are not required to allow any of this functionality
> unless the community decides they want it. The major argument for
> keeping it, in my mind, is to be helpful to Red Hat.
>
> My current idea is to keep --help-config as readable output, add
> --help-config-raw as machine-readable output, document those, and remove
> all the additional flags.

I'm beginning to think that we should scrap it and start with a real
design for 7.5. I know that's radical, but I don't think we're going to
arrive at anything that anyone's going to like by the time we want to
release.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-14 22:08:27 Re: postgres --help-config
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-14 21:23:24 Re: fix for strict-alias warnings