Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date: 2003-09-27 10:08:20
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309271207180.11938-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Oliver Elphick writes:

> + <para>
> + With a large dump, it may be difficult to identify where any errors are
> + occurring. You may use the -e option to psql to print the SQL commands
> + as they are run, so that it is easy to see precisely which commands are
> + causing errors.
> </para>

That is just not true. If you use -f, it will tell you the line number of
the command causing the error. Add the line number of the COPY error
message, there you have it.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven Schwyn 2003-09-27 10:51:50 Modification Dates
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-27 09:31:04 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-27 12:13:27 Re: 2-phase commit
Previous Message Kevin Brown 2003-09-27 10:00:21 Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable.

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-27 16:29:47 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-27 09:31:04 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)