Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date: 2003-09-26 20:27:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309262225530.11938-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Bruce Momjian writes:

> The argument that you want a warning because you might have mixed
> newlines in the file seems less likely than this case where they are
> using a literal carriage return as a data value at the end of the line.

I don't agree with that assessment. Who actually has CRs in their data?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 20:35:37 Re: Schema backup
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 20:22:08 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-26 20:35:56 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 20:22:08 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-26 20:35:56 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 20:22:08 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)