Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference
Date: 2003-09-03 22:12:27
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309040010430.1035-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Tom Lane writes:

> I'm starting to look at updating the docs to match 7.4 error message
> spellings. I find that a large part of the work I'll have to do is in
> updating the "Diagnostics" (formerly "Outputs") section of the command
> reference pages. I am wondering if it wouldn't be better to just rip
> out these sections entirely.

I agree with ripping out the messages part, but it might be useful to show
the completion tag somewhere, especially in cases where it contains
additional information (e.g., UPDATE).

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-03 22:17:31 Re: Suggested patch to plpgsql docs (7.4beta)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-03 21:31:09 Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference pages?