| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Carlos Guzman Alvarez <carlosga(at)telefonica(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof |
| Date: | 2003-08-31 19:06:17 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0308312105420.1119-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Carlos Guzman Alvarez writes:
> > The JDBC guys wanted to know it. Why is not clear to me, but I figured
> > it was easy enough to make them happy.
>
> I'm using it too in my .NET Data Provider for allow atomatic encoding of
> strings before send it to the server.
Why would you want to do that? The server can do the encoding conversion.
You're bound to get into trouble using this approach.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-08-31 19:09:16 | Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-08-31 19:03:58 | Re: "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-08-31 19:09:58 | Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof |
| Previous Message | Paul Thomas | 2003-08-30 09:12:31 | Re: java_objects and create table |