Re: Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

From: sumit <sumit(at)gdit(dot)iiit(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for adding DATACUBE operator
Date: 2003-06-30 16:03:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0306302132010.22358-100000@students.iiit.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Thanks for letting know. Could you also let me know the exact
syntax, I mean, we are not sure whether GROUP BY CUBE(...) is followed by
a HAVING clause. Kindly inform us soon so that we can make the changes and
send you the updated patch and files.

Sumit

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> SQL99 defines a GROUP BY CUBE(...) operation, which seems to do the same
> thing as this. Why are you using a nonstandard syntax?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-06-30 16:48:40 Re: Patch for adding DATACUBE operator
Previous Message Carlos Guzman Alvarez 2003-06-30 15:11:21 Re: Question about array read using protocol 3.0 implementation

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-30 16:35:51 Postgresql.conf, initdb patch
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-06-30 15:46:52 Re: pgAdmin3 translation request into Russian