| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Guillaume LELARGE <gleu(at)wanadoo(dot)fr>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Gould <andrewgould(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] capturing and storing query statement with |
| Date: | 2003-06-27 12:37:11 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0306271322480.5890-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway writes:
> I was thinking something similar. This exact question has come up at
> least three times in the last three months. I doubt we'd want a special
> keyword like CURRENT_QUERY, but maybe current_query()?
The current statement can be examined using the statistics views and
functions.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-06-27 12:39:32 | developers.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Claudio Lapidus | 2003-06-27 12:36:41 | Re: Vacuum (table performance) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-06-27 12:37:55 | Re: row description for domain in 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-06-27 12:36:37 | Re: .pot files are unavailable (?) |