| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |
| Date: | 2003-05-31 15:55:16 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0305311754110.6382-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Where do we want to go with this? It is interesting that it maps MySQL
> SHOW commands on top of our existing SHOW syntax in psql. The patch
> doesn't look too big.
The response to "Are we losing momentum?" isn't to add redundant syntax
for nonstandard features that we have no control over.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-31 16:49:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-05-31 07:39:34 | Re: [GENERAL] Are we losing momentum? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-31 16:49:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-31 15:49:40 | Re: psql: FATAL: Missing or erroneous pg_hba.conf file |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-05-31 15:56:52 | Use of Intel compiler on Linux |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-31 15:47:48 | Re: Postgres config file: autocommit = off |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-31 16:49:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-05-31 10:35:43 | Re: XML ouput for psql |