| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GUC patch for Win32 |
| Date: | 2003-05-04 02:11:56 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0305040409500.2984-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > What about all the other global variables? Will there be a separate
> > mechanism for each kind?
>
> Good question. I am not sure yet. I figured I would hit the GUC ones
> first because they are easy and all in one place, then see what others
> exist in the Peer Direct patch.
Well, the question of what to do with all the global variables seems to be
a central point in the port, given that no fork() function exists. So
I think that should be solved before piecewise solutions for some
variables are installed that will become obsolete later on.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-04 03:08:09 | Re: GUC patch for Win32 |
| Previous Message | Bradley Baetz | 2003-05-04 01:14:58 | Re: apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses |