From: | Dennis Björklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: String changes |
Date: | 2003-03-08 18:44:39 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0303081927110.27526-100000@zigo.dhs.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > - puts(gettext("Using pager is always."));
> > + puts(gettext("Always use pager."));
> > else
> > puts(gettext("Using pager is off."));
>
> Then how about "Never use pager." ?
This setting is still mostly boolean, it toggles between on and off if you
don't explicitly set it. I left it as is because most other settings are
still on/off.
I changed "Using pager is always." because it is not good english.
For me it's fine with "Using pager is off." but I wouldn't protest if it
was changed. Both are just as fine if you ask me.
> > - fprintf(output, _("\n"));
> > + fprintf(output, "\n");
>
> and what about all the other _( ) ? (Looks a bit like php to me..)
I don't know what you ask here. Do you have an example of a _( ) that is
not needed then it should be removed of course. The rest that I saw was
needed.
_() is used for translations. To mark "\n" for translation make no sense.
--
/Dennis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-08 20:07:08 | Re: String changes |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2003-03-08 15:46:24 | Re: String changes |