| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: XML ouput for psql |
| Date: | 2003-03-05 22:38:27 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0303051835290.2224-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> One thing I have noticed about the schemes that are being advanced is that
> they seem to be inherently unspecifiable, formally, because column names are
> being used as tags.
The SQL/XML draft addresses this by specifying that a mapping from SQL
things to XML things spits out both the specification (XML Schema, IIRC)
and the data in one operation.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-03-05 22:39:12 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-03-05 22:37:35 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-06 00:16:54 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-03-05 22:37:35 | Re: XML ouput for psql |