Re: ILIKE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ILIKE
Date: 2003-02-24 17:02:02
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0302241800420.2108-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vince Vielhaber writes:

> > It's never too late for new users to reconsider. It's also never too late
> > to change your application of performance is not satisfactory.
>
> And if performance is satisfactory?

Hey, I don't want to take your ILIKE away. But at the time it was added
the claim was that it was for compatibility and now we learn that that was
wrong. That is something to make people aware of, for example in the
documentation.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

  • Re: ILIKE at 2003-02-24 12:38:34 from Vince Vielhaber

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-24 17:30:44 Re: ILIKE
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-02-24 17:00:27 Outdated example in documentation