Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: No migration path for MONEY

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No migration path for MONEY
Date: 2003-01-28 19:24:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301272215480.789-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian writes:

> we need someone to get MONEY working as an extented NUMERIC type.

How would the new "money" be different from "numeric"?  If we have
"money", should we have "length", "mass", and "temperature"?  I think not.
Just let the money type die and that's it.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2003-01-28 20:26:06
Subject: Re: Bug in LIKE operator processing
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-01-27 22:01:40
Subject: Re: recent (just got from cvs) build doesn't run nicely

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group