Re: No migration path for MONEY

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No migration path for MONEY
Date: 2003-01-28 19:24:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301272215480.789-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian writes:

> we need someone to get MONEY working as an extented NUMERIC type.

How would the new "money" be different from "numeric"? If we have
"money", should we have "length", "mass", and "temperature"? I think not.
Just let the money type die and that's it.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-01-28 20:26:06 Re: Bug in LIKE operator processing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-27 22:01:40 Re: recent (just got from cvs) build doesn't run nicely