Re: No migration path for MONEY

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No migration path for MONEY
Date: 2003-02-14 19:42:55
Message-ID: 200302141942.h1EJgtl29503@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


Could we use DOMAIN to make MONEY an alias for NUMERIC, perhaps using
locale to make it customized, somehow?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > we need someone to get MONEY working as an extented NUMERIC type.
>
> How would the new "money" be different from "numeric"? If we have
> "money", should we have "length", "mass", and "temperature"? I think not.
> Just let the money type die and that's it.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-02-14 21:00:22 Function will not back up on 7.2.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 15:22:38 Re: porting on ITANIUM2 platform under HP-UX