Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE
Date: 2003-01-23 18:31:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301231930250.789-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane writes:

> I'm not eager to pick up evidently-poorly-thought-out features from a
> draft spec that is nowhere near being frozen. Anyway, didn't we decide
> that converging syntax with 200X was a bad idea if we weren't going to
> converge semantics?

I think we realized that the semantics are the same.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-23 18:33:44 Re: [PATCHES] targetlist functions part 1 (was targetlist
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2003-01-23 18:28:50 Fix segfault in pg_restore