Re: IPv6 patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>, Nigel Kukard <nkukard(at)lbsd(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 patch
Date: 2003-01-09 21:50:44
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301092138500.29178-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> OK, Peter, to keep you and everyone happy, what changes are your
> proposing to the existing code, if any. The only current behavior is
> printing an IPv6 failure for IPv6-enabled backend in the server logs.

Just bind to all addresses you can find, IPv4 or IPv6. And leave
pg_hba.conf alone.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-09 21:50:55 EXPLAIN EXECUTE
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-09 21:50:35 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL libraries - PThread Support, but