| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)tr(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker |
| Date: | 2003-01-02 23:07:52 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0301022009570.7742-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Yes, I have been feeling we should do that. Justin pointed out just
> yesterday that .pgpass is only mentioned in libpq documentation, and in
> fact there is lots of stuff mentioned in libpq that releates to the
> other interfaces, so it should be pulled out and put in one place.
It is difficult to make out which place that would be. You can duplicate
the information in every place where an interface or tool that uses libpq
is documented, but that doesn't seem to be conceptually superior.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-02 23:16:07 | Re: pg_dump.options.diff |
| Previous Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2003-01-02 22:51:55 | Re: pg_dump.options.diff |