Re: Outstanding patches

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Outstanding patches
Date: 2002-11-07 21:21:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0211072059410.1018-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway writes:

> Last I heard, we had concluded that SQL2003's notion of a sequence is
> sufficiently close to ours that the differences are mostly syntax.

I concur, but do we have some sort of commitment that the rest of
the SQL200x sequence machinery will be supported eventually? Otherwise,
adding some irrelevant syntax variations in limited places doesn't seem
fruitful.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-11-07 21:21:56 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-11-07 21:20:51 Re: Too late for translation updates?