On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 at 18:23, Reinhard Max wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 at 12:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Why do we need that ppc64 code? It appears identical to the ppc
> > code
The difference is the symbol name ("tas" vs. ".tas") which is needed
because of the different ABIs of ppc and ppc64.
> > (except for missing isync, which means it's broken on multi-CPU
> > boxes).
This was indeed a bug.
> I'll re-check that with the ppc architecture guy here.
... he is now about to write an inlined version that can go into
s_lock.h . I'll send the new patch later on...
cu
Reinhard