From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS split problems |
Date: | 2002-10-22 20:10:43 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0210221957050.928-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> Okay, this is the only message(s) I have on this ... since "merging"
> earthdistance back into the tree will most likely cause more headaches,
> breakage and outcries, and since I see no reason why anyone would want to
> 'checkout' a module that has already been checked out (instead of doing an
> update like the rest of us), there is no way I'm going to put
> earthdistance back in ...
>
> ... unless there is, in fact, a completely different problem?
It causes a useless and confusing divergence between the module names used
to check out things and the names that appear in various messages, files,
and the online views. Certainly it'd be a bad idea to do this now, but
please do it after 7.3 is released. Just because removing a silliness
causes a brief inconvenience is no reason to hang on to a silliness.
> Once v7.3 is released, I'd like to see a continuation of moving the
> non-core stuff over to GBorg, as well, so this will likely disappear at
> that time ...
The issues I point out would continue to exist.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-10-22 20:11:18 | Re: One 7.3 item left |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-22 19:16:18 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |