Re: directional marks

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: nngodinh(at)tiscali(dot)it
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: directional marks
Date: 2002-09-16 23:08:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209170056530.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

nngodinh(at)tiscali(dot)it writes:

> I'm speaking about directional marks that are ignored by - for instance
> - by Microsoft SQL 7.0 because they're unuseful in that position (like when
> they're in a one way text either left-to-right or right-to-left). It may
> happen that this kind of symbols are randomly inserted: for example...

To me this sounds analogous to inserting tons of <space><backspace>
sequences into a string and expecting the software to automatically figure
out that they cancel. It would be possible, but it would probably add a
lot of overhead and it doesn't seem to be requested a lot. The best
solution is probably to fix your data. Unless you can point to a Unicode
standard that states that such cancellation should happen.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-09-17 01:30:47 Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-16 21:54:00 Bug: COPY IN doesn't test domain constraints