Jan Wieck writes:
> I think we will have no chance to really return the number of
> VIEW-tuples affected. So any implementation is only a guess and we could
> simply return fixed 42 if "some" tuples where affected at all. This
> return is as wrong (according to Steve) as everything else but at least
> we have a clear definition what it means.
Maybe we should return something to the effect of "unknown, but something
happened". I can see that returning 0 in case of doubt might confuse
applications.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net