Re: wrong information about unlimied size of text field?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Hubert depesz Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wrong information about unlimied size of text field?
Date: 2002-09-03 18:55:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209032032310.1157-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hubert depesz Lubaczewski writes:

> according to what i know, where is a limit for up to 2gigabytes of data
> in text fields (according to c.h).
> this limit is of course very big, but i belive it should be mentioned in
> datatype.sgml instead of saying:

If you continue reading you will find

The storage requirement for data of these types is 4 bytes plus
the actual string, and in case of <type>character</type> plus the
padding. Long strings will be compressed by the system
automatically, so the physical requirement on disk may be less.
In any case, the longest possible character string
that can be stored is about 1 GB. (The maximum value that will be
allowed for <replaceable>n</> in the data type declaration is
less than that. It wouldn't be very useful to change
this because with multibyte character encodings the number of
characters and bytes can be quite different anyway. If you desire
to store long strings with no specific upper limit, use <type>text</type>
or <type>character varying</type> without a length specifier,
rather than making up an arbitrary length limit.)

which seems to be the information you are looking for.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-03 18:59:34 Re: VERY SMALL DOC BUG: http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?sql-createtable.html
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-03 18:53:05 Re: wrong information about unlimied size of text field?