| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Future of src/utils |
| Date: | 2002-07-16 21:57:37 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0207161946170.9047-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Yea, I thought of that. Means all the subdirectores have to move too.
> It is more extreme than moving stuff from /src/utils, but it is more
> logical.
I don't think we need to move the subdirectories, which involve stuff
that's heavily tied to the backend. But the generic C library replacement
files should move into src/utils preferably. In fact, what we could do is
assemble all the files we need (as determined by configure) into a static
library and link all executables with that. That way we don't have to
deal with the individual files in each individual makefile.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-07-16 21:58:00 | Re: bit type external representation |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-07-16 21:57:18 | Re: utils C files |