Re: libpq++ build problems

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, jtv <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq++ build problems
Date: 2002-07-07 10:58:57
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0207062353570.929-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> As a general rule, anything that affects one *BSD affects them all.
> I am always very suspicious of any patch that changes only one of
> the *BSD templates or makefiles. I'm not even convinced we should
> have separate makefiles/templates for 'em ...

If they could retroactively agree on a way to build shared libraries, we
might have a shot.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-07-07 12:30:57 Re: Proposal: CREATE CONVERSION
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-07-07 10:58:37 Re: libpq++ build problems