Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ron Snyder <snyder(at)roguewave(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't
Date: 2002-06-17 21:19:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0206172003040.943-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Probably we should have temp table creation allowed to all by default.

Agreed.

> I'm not convinced that that's a good idea for schema-creation privilege
> though.

Agreed. (not good)

> Related issues: what should initdb set as the permissions for template1?

Same as above.

> What about copying those per-database config settings Peter just
> invented?

You're not supposed to put those into template1 anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-06-17 21:20:24 Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-06-17 21:19:33 Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port