Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE

From: tycho(at)fruru(dot)com
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Date: 2002-04-17 10:55:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0204171251180.16846-100000@perycles.unix.be.EU.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> Let me add people's expections of the optimizer and the "it isn't using
> the index" questions are getting very old. I have beefed up the FAQ
> item on this a month ago, but that hasn't reduced the number of
> questions. I almost want to require people to read a specific FAQ item
> 4.8 before we will reply to anything.
>
> Maybe we need an optimizer FAQ that will answer the basic questions for
> people.

Perhaps you could also include some kind of (possibly nonsensical) keyword
like "flerbage" in the faq, asking the user to include it in his question
to prove he has actually read the relevant section ?

Just my 0,02 Euro

Cheers,
Tycho

--
Tycho Fruru tycho(dot)fruru(at)conostix(dot)com
"Prediction is extremely difficult. Especially about the future."
- Niels Bohr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-04-17 13:10:38 Re: problem with anoncvs?
Previous Message Jean-Paul ARGUDO 2002-04-17 10:15:03 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE