Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer

From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)townnews(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer
Date: 2001-06-22 12:24:28
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0106220822240.14272-100000@hamster.lee.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Justin Clift wrote:

> For my example, I'd use this to add random positive increments (specifically
> to avoid easy predictability of the sequence), but it would be quite flexible.

It's called a trigger. Just take out the sequence, and build a trigger
that does this for you. That's why Postgres has them, after all.

--
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Shaun M. Thomas INN Database Programmer |
| Phone: (309) 743-0812 Fax : (309) 743-0830 |
| Email: sthomas(at)townnews(dot)com AIM : trifthen |
| Web : hamster.lee.net |
| |
| "Most of our lives are about proving something, either to |
| ourselves or to someone else." |
| -- Anonymous |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul 2001-06-22 12:54:16 Re[4]: Postgres is too slow?
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-22 11:55:56 Re: Re[2]: Postgres is too slow?