| From: | Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |
| Date: | 2007-02-09 20:25:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0702091223150.13334-100000@denzel.in |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> No matter how many different models you have in parallel, one single
> transaction will be either a master, a slave or an isolated local thing.
> The proposed changes allow to tell the session which of these three
> roles it is playing and the triggers and rules can be configured to fire
> during master/local role, slave role, always or never. That
> functionality will work for master-slave as well as multi-master.
>
> Although my current plan isn't creating such a blended system, the
> proposed trigger and rule changes are designed to support exactly that
> in a 100% backward compatible way.
>
> Jan
Fantastic! ...At some point you'll be thinking of the management end -
turning it on or off, etc. That might be where these other points come
more into play.
Richard
--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com, http://ScienceTools.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-09 20:25:27 | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |
| Previous Message | Richard Troy | 2007-02-09 20:20:55 | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |