From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | twosk <twosk(at)interia(dot)pl> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: embeding postgre |
Date: | 2004-02-20 22:19:58 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0402201518140.12602-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, twosk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question, because i cannot find any information in online docs
> (maybe i'm just blind :P).
> I'm want to build application with embedded database, but i also need a
> possibility to have one global database, which can be accessed from internet
> (ability to synchronize between remote and local/embedded database). I heard
> from somone that i could use PostgreSQL, but I cannot find any information
> that confirms or denies it. And one more thing, i'm interested only in free
> solution ;).
> Sorry for if i made some mistakes, english is not my native language.
>
> I'll be appreciate for any information.
You should probably consider either firebird if you need a "real" database
with locking real transactions and all that, or sqllite if all you need is
a nice fast single user database with a sql interface.
Postgresql is really not suited to embedded applications.
Of course, in 50 years, when embedded applications are running on Star
Trek technology, and Postgresql is a quaint old thing, it might make
sense, but today, most embedded devices having memory in the hundreds of
megabytes designed to have only a few hundred thousand writes to each
memory cell, it's just not a good choice.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-02-20 22:25:18 | Re: finding out actual tuple size |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-02-20 21:48:40 | Re: backup and restore questions |