Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-23 13:25:56
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0306230725470.23701-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait 6
> > months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the PITR
> > stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
>
> What concerns me is that we thought that after 7.3, and didn't do much
> work on either until we got near 7.4 release. I wonder if this is just
> going to be a pattern, where these items are so large, we can't get any
> motivation to focus on them until we get near the final release. I
> guess if each final release gets us a little closer, eventually we will
> get there, but this process is not ideal.
>
> The big puzzle is how do you get people (including myself) motivated to
> work on a feature that takes a _huge_ amount of work to see any payoff?
> I would like to know. Anyone?

Pizza? :-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ohp 2003-06-23 13:30:26 ftp mirror
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-23 12:46:11 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze