From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "alexandre :: aldeia digital" <alepaes(at)aldeiadigital(dot)com(dot)br>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 30-70 seconds query... |
Date: | 2003-03-31 23:44:32 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0303311644100.13078-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> I said:
> > PG 7.4 will be better prepared to handle this sort of query, but I don't
> > think it will realize that the T1/T2 left join could be reduced to a
> > plain join given these conditions
>
> I take that back --- actually, the algorithm used in CVS tip *does*
> deduce that all these left joins can be plain joins.
>
> Don't suppose you'd like to experiment with a current snapshot to see
> how well it does for you?
Think we can get the authors of the case tool that started this to include
it? :-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | alexandre :: aldeia digital | 2003-04-01 12:23:42 | Re: 30-70 seconds query... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-31 22:58:32 | Re: 30-70 seconds query... |