| From: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Backup very large databases |
| Date: | 2002-04-20 13:37:09 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0204200632100.20224-100000@main.cyber-office.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
> might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
> lists. Anyone else agree? Or does the pgsql-general list readership
> want to see this stuff?
I don't mind it in general but would use a pgsql-perform list if it
existed.
Rod
--
Why is it so easy to throw caution to the wind.
Shouldn't it be heavier and shaped like an anvil?
Jon Anderson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Lane | 2002-04-20 13:56:43 | Re: Backup very large databases |
| Previous Message | Hubert depesz Lubaczewski | 2002-04-20 10:40:05 | feature (feature status) request - function overriding table permissions |