Re: Backup and Recovery

From: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>
To: Naomi Walker <nwalker(at)eldocomp(dot)com>
Cc: "P(dot) Dwayne Miller" <dmiller(at)espgroup(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backup and Recovery
Date: 2001-06-20 11:26:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0106201212240.25630-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Naomi Walker wrote:

> Even more important that uptime to us, is to never put ourselves in a
> position where we could lose data. I understand I can do a hot backup
> with pg_dumpall. What we need on top of that is the ability to replay
> the transaction logs against the previous database archive. Without
> such a feature, even if I did a full backup a few times a day, we
> would be vulnerable to losing hours of data (which would not be
> acceptable to our users).

This is what I'd like too (though I'm not that bothered about
rolling forward from a dump if I can just do it by replaying
logs onto real datafiles).

I mentioned it a while ago:

http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=114397

but got no response.

You are aware that you can still lose up to (by default) 16Mb
worth of transactions in this scheme, I presume?

Matthew.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2001-06-20 11:38:03 Re:
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-06-20 11:16:21 Re: RE: Universal admin frontend