| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "make report" |
| Date: | 2002-04-24 18:14:29 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204241411000.682-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> Right. The two areas which come to mind are integer availability and the
> timezone support (as you might know we support *three* different time
> zone models). At the moment, none of the developers know the features
> supported on the platforms we claim to support. Which platforms do not
> have int8 support still?
"Still" is the wrong word. There used to be platforms with certain areas
of trouble, and those platforms don't go away.
But since you asked: QNX 4 and SCO OpenServer are known to lack 8 byte
integers.
> Which do not have time zone interfaces fitting
> into the two "zonefull" styles? I'd like to know, but istm that the
> people *with* the platforms could do this much more easily than those
> without. What am I missing here??
I don't think polling users this way will yield reliable results. If you
really want to find out, break something and see if someone complains.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Kovalenko | 2002-04-24 18:19:22 | Re: "make report" |
| Previous Message | Michael Loftis | 2002-04-24 17:33:19 | Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction |