Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mario Weilguni <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date: 2002-04-24 05:41:00
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204240140230.688-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This patch does not compile correctly:

pg_backup_archiver.c: In function `ahwrite':
pg_backup_archiver.c:1252: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
pg_backup_archiver.c:1259: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
pg_backup_archiver.c:1263: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
make: *** [pg_backup_archiver.o] Error 1

Bruce Momjian writes:

>
> Patch applied. Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Mario Weilguni wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 11. April 2002 17:44 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > > "Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com> writes:
> > > > And I did not find out how I can detect the large object
> > > > chunksize, either from getting it from the headers (include
> > > > "storage/large_object.h" did not work)
> > >
> >
> > You did not answer if it's ok to post the patch, hope it's ok:
>
>

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2002-04-24 05:58:15 Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-24 05:40:01 Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd)