| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? |
| Date: | 2002-04-24 01:10:20 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204232109000.688-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Based on this report, I am adding a FUNC_MAX_ARGS define to
> > > src/include/pg_config.h.win32. Certainly if we have INDEX_MAX_KEYS in
> > > there, we should have FUNC_MAX_ARGS too.
> >
> > We probably shouldn't have either one in there.
>
> I thought so too, but the reporter complained something didn't compile
> without it. What should we do?
I'm working right now on removing traces of FUNC_MAX_ARGS, INDEX_MAX_KEYS,
and NAMEDATALEN from frontend code (pg_dump and psql). When I'm done I
will remove the definition from pg_config.h.win32.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-24 01:56:58 | Re: Patch for xlog.c |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-24 00:57:35 | Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? |